When using SUB in the conversational modifier, there should not be a charge as you substituting one thing for another (or else what the point of using SUB)
Right now when I sub one topping for another, the customer gets charged for the topping instead of not paying extra because it is a substitution.
Am I missing something here?
Hello @EUPHORIA.
Thanks for coming back to our Seller Community! I'm happy to check with our Restaurant's Team if we offer a workaround for sub toppings as this seems to be a feature request.
I will make sure to circle back on here to provide more details if any. Thank you.
Seems like the reason this can be happening is because your sub item/modifier has a price associated with it. If you want your customers to substitute an item without getting charged you will need to create an additional modifier without a zero price that is used only for substitutions.
Please let me know if that works. 👀
Thanks @sayra this is not a great workaround because I would then have to make a second modifier list of all the toppings without any prices. I have a list of over 30 toppings.
I also don't understand the point of having a conversational modifier "Sub" if using it is just going to charge the customer full price for a substitution. Sub should not charge any amount, because that is what it is, a substitution. I am substituting one topping that is already included in the price of the pizza for another that is not. Similarly, if I type "No" followed by a topping, the amount is not discounted either. For example, I have spinach pizza that comes with onions. If a customer wants NO onion SUB tomatoes for example now they are paying extra for a substitution.
Does this make sense?
I am not sure how other folks are dealing with this, but our old POS was able to handle this logic.
Following up on this one as our staff has been asking about this. @sayra
It looks like I'm replying to a very old thread but I'm in the same pickle and wondering if you ever heard anything back
Square Community
Square Products